4.7 (543) In stock
Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
James Towner's research works University of Rochester, Rochester (UR) and other places
Average Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores are shown. Significant
Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)
In Vitro Biomechanical and Fluoroscopic Study of a Continuously Expandable Interbody Spacer Concerning Its Role in Insertion Force and Segmental Kinematics
A and B) Immediate postoperative AP and lateral images of the above
Frontiers Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering
PDF] One and two level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using an expandable, stand-alone, interbody fusion device: a VariLift® case series.
Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
In Vitro Biomechanical and Fluoroscopic Study of a Continuously Expandable Interbody Spacer Concerning Its Role in Insertion Force and Segmental Kinematics
Minimally Invasive Spinous Process Fixation and Fusion
A and B) Immediate postoperative AP and lateral images of the above
Radiological angles. Perfect tibial position is defined as γ angle 90
Average visual analogue scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores are shown.
